Cornerstones of
Science


CML Home

Library Catalog Search

Cornerstones Links:

Advisory Board,
Management Committee
& Cornerstones History


Book Lists & Reviews

Citizen Science Opportunities

COS National - Get Your Library Involved

Audio Books, DVDs & Videos

Getting to the Library

Newsletters

Programs

Curtis Memorial Library Program Calendar

Read, Write & Win

Websites of the Month

Maine's Virtual Library (MARVEL): Science & Technology

 

Comments & Questions
cosinfo @curtislibrary.com

Submit Your Recommendations cornerstones @curtislibrary.com

 

Enough: Staying Human in an Engineered Age
by Bill McKibben
The great civil rights activist Martin Luther King Jr. once said, “All progress is precarious, and the solution of one problem brings us face to face with another problem.” This is a statement that Bill McKibben, author of Enough: Staying Human in an Engineered Age, would agree wholeheartedly with. McKibben would like scientific progress on Earth to come to a grinding halt. This is essentially a manifesto, albeit one that provides a harsh wake-up call to all those who support the headlong rush of technology.

In this book the author predicts a future in which nobody is really human anymore, as a result of advances in genetic engineering and robotics. He argues that the state of the world is fine just like it is which is a bit rich coming from an upper-middle-class writer that has enough to eat and can get sufficient medical attention. Still, this is an engaging read, though it does get preachy at times. The writing is clear and reasonably fast paced and it piqued my interest in these subjects. The book made me want to learn more about these emerging fields—for they are shaping our world for better or worse.

This was a good, easy to read book that will awaken many readers to the all too relevant dangers and benefits of genetic engineering and robotics. I enjoyed reading this book because it made me think about these fields in ways I hadn’t before. I would recommend this book to my friends as a good starting point for further reading on these subjects. The main failing of this book was the subjectivity of it. I would rather read a science book that presents more of both sides of an argument. For this reason, I think this book should stay a Cornerstones of Science nominee.

~ Tom G. of Bangor, ME
1st Place 8th Grade / Read, Write & Win 2007

Executive Director
Jocelyn Hubbell

jhubbell @ curtislibrary.com
(207) 725-5242 ext. 238

Cornerstones of Science

Last updated May 29, 2007